The Network Marketing Success Ezine

FOX FORUM: Obama Wants to Control the Web

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/10/05/phil-kerpen-obama-internet-czar-acorn/ 10/5/2009 8:01:03 PM

If you thought Washington—which already took over banking and autos, and is fast-tracking attempts to take over health care and energy—would leave the Internet alone, you were dead wrong. The Internet (perhaps our greatest free market success story in recent years) is squarely in the cross-hairs of the administration and it’s not waiting for Congress to act. The charge is being led by an eager, ideologically committed White House staffer named Susan Crawford. Officially, she is the Special Assistant for Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy. Wired Magazine calls her, “the most powerful geek close to the president.” In recent weeks, bloggers and online activists have begun calling Crawford the "Internet Czar." The shoe fits.

Fascism – a political theory advocating an authoritarian hierarchical government as opposed to democracy or liberalism.

Authoritarian hierarchy – A form of government in which the governing body has absolute, or almost absolute, control. Typically this control is maintained by force, and little heed is paid to public opinion or the judicial system; The organization off which structured in a way such that every entity in the organization, except one, is subordinate to a single other entity.

Adult domain names for sale blog

combined with the anticipated release of a advanced product from a different manufacturer? The prevalent mindset was to create more and unload them on the market to maintain profit margins, but the advertising for the advanced product release further dampened any opportunities for that success. The competition wiped you out before they ever hit the floor with a product. This goes back to issues of espionage, as the amount of information that is sold, greatly supersedes any potential rate of production or sales. Previously, when this has happened in history it usually result is a big war. Why war? because during the course of big wars, there develops an underlying movement for reconstruction. What I really appreciate about current leadership in the world is that there are so many of these world leaders that oppose that paradigm. But back to your problem for a moment…You can't bailout a sinking ship by putting more people and cargo on board. There is actually a lot more to this but I'd like to talk to people in private without this "one world" and "new world order" lurking about because that is the crux of the problem. I'll try to write more later…I hope the US auto industry is reading this and by the way I am happy to hear that your union is being more conciliatory and you really must abstain from extending credit/discounts/perks through a "friends and family" type network to all these bozos that took your initial good concept of providing for your employees, and bled you into unconsciousness with it.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081204/ap_on_go_co/congress_autos

How much can all these auto execs and union officials contribute to this $34B to keep you in business, how many incentives can employees forego to keep jobs and how stringent are you going to be about extending credit to unqualified individuals and groups(for groups still must have stringent criterion for individual applicant approvals) Finally, who the hell has been minding this concession stand?